About your Search

20121101
20121130
Search Results 0 to 20 of about 21 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> yep. >> another winning -- another winner on a close call in idaho. idaho is going to governor romney. governor romney wins idaho with four electoral votes. nbc news projecting mitt romney the winner there. >> couple of big states out of the pacific northwest as we continue to hear the crowds at democracy plaza. the state of oregon, too early to call. although nbc news is saying that the president, barack obama, does lead in the state of oregon. and washington state. nbc news projects that barack obama will take the state of washington. there are some cheers in democracy plaza. we'll go back to there as the map fills in as the night goes on. >> not really clear who the fan base is for because you're hearing the same kind of, you know, phrase for both obama and romney. >> puts the president at 243 which is less than 30 points needed to get to 270. things are getting important here. in the meantime, your headlines at this hour. nbc news projecting obama ahead in electoral votes after sweeping up california as we mentioned. wisconsin, new hampshire. the first of the battleground state al
't worry, i'm going to give you some picks for an upset by governor romney, although i'm on record thinking it's most likely not going to go the governor's way. but i bow to popular demand. first up, let's figure out how stocks have really done under president obama and i'm going to use a prism that i haven't seen anybody else use, the five-year lookback. you cannot use the inauguration day as the starting point. there's too much priced in at that point. almost every stock is higher, so it's irrelevant. the s&p is up 75% from inauguration. we need to go back to when the great recession was just about to begin. it became clear the next occupant in the white house could be a democrat, proved my thesis that if obama wins, it might not matter the stocks nearly as much as you think. anyway, with this five-year timeframe, the phrase "under obama" as most oil stocks fared badly under obama, simply doesn't hold up under any rigorous scrutiny. some stocks have done better with obama than without him. others will fare better if romney wins, as i'll explain later in the show and we'll expand tomorrow
few weeks that obama was going to lose. that romney had decided to spend a ton of money and win pennsylvania and ohio and he already owned florida. so it's all a done deal. don't believe me? did you watch cnbc's coverage last night? republican after republican came on saying that such a scenario would play out, right up until ohio got called for the president. these people were just plain, out right sellers today. they bought in anticipation of a romney win. they sell on a romney loss. most of my investors will say oh, yeah, hey, sure. let that run its course. i'm not going to sell my gap stores for target, right or wrong. however, i would rebut that we suddenly have a new word. the head of the european central bank mario draghi picked today of all days to say things have worsened dramatically in europe, including germany. that means there's a new sense of urgency to fix the europeanness and we're learning to be wary of the way europeans are going about their "bailouts." here's what the client would say. wait a second. we've been through this before. why do i have to take any ac
, gee, governor romney lost. as long as his candidacy was alive, a chance for a deal was alive because a new cast of characters in washington would be coming in. typically a republican in the white house that gives you the hope of anything drastic could be reached. now we're back to the same antagonists who couldn't agree last time. so i have another comeback. my pro. simple. why shouldn't we think something can be worked out and the politicians can rise above this partisan warfare? the intransigence of the republicans arguably cost them the white house. and a bunch of what should have been certain senate seats. something that should have been a given, given the lousy unemployment numbers. they have to realize it's electoral suicide to stick by the promise to never raise taxes for the ultra rich. if they do so, they run the risk of being voted out of congress. that's the take away of tuesday night. it's a pretty powerful incentive that could bring about a resolution that doesn't dramatically raise taxes on stocks. and that might tip people back into the market. as they realize that ris
levels. we have the ceiling created for the highs. let's call that the romney rally which creates a thick wall of resistance to $14.50. if we beat the re-election highs, then there is still one last barrier even though it broke down before the election. the move would pea ter out. right now we are out in the same area and then start giving up ground. to get over the symmetry problem. the s&p needs to close over 1391 and needs to do it real fast. even though brodin has a costly attitude. the new line in the sand is the november 16th line of 1346. here is the bottom line. based on the reading of the charts, br are o dodin things it a flash in the pan. her chart suggests it was perhaps a real bottom. if we go over the fiscal cliff, it is good to have the charts or her reading of the charts on the bull side again. m "mad money" is back after the break. if we want to improve our schools... ... what should we invest in? maybe new buildings? what about updated equipment? they can help, but recent research shows... ... nothing transforms schools like investing in advanced teacher education. let's
that the romney rally which creates a thick wall of resistance to 1450. if we beat the pre-election highs, then there is still one last barrier even though it broke down after the election. every time it would rally, the move would peter out. right now we are out in the same area and then start giving up ground. to get over the symmetry problem the s&p needs to close over 1391 and needs to do it real fast. even though brodin has a constantly positive attitude, the new line in the sand is the november 16th line of 1346. here is the bottom line. based on the reading of the charts, brodin things yesterday's rally was not a flash in the pan. her chart suggests it was perhaps a real bottom. if we go over the fiscal cliff, things are going to get bad. it is good to have the charts or her reading of the charts on the bull side again. "mad money" is back after the break. sometimes what we suffer from is bigger than we think ... like the flu. with aches, fever and chills- the flu's a really big deal. so why treat it like it's a little cold? there's something that works differently than over-the-co
been trash. sell sell sell! got hammered more than any other when romney lost the election. it doesn't have a game plan for obamacare. i think it tuz and the stock could react positively. that's another trade besides petsmart and ross stories. the fiscal cliff is a serious probable but you can't allow yourself to become so pessimistic that you lose sight of all the opportunities out there or the fact that as weak as things seem. while we have an audience filled with veterans, let's start with a question that comes alile further away from home. take a look. >> hey, jim, sending you horned frog boo-yahs from kuwait. now i'm an army reservist and we're redeploying next year. i'm going back to my job in the defense industry. what do you think defense contractors are going to be like next year in the stock market? >> it's a great question. this is the group that hangs most in the balance by this issue called sequestration. it's the defense spending budget that will be cut so that means they have got to rely on dividend. lockheed martin has the best, safest yield. i say that would be the o
to stop the fiscal cliff jump, ceos who contributed to the romney campaign have to recognize that policies they backed including no compromise with democrats did not and are not going to succeed. sorry. that's what that election meant. they must switch their firepower, directing it towards those that would work on compromise, republican or democrat, to prevent the cliff jump. they're starting to do that now with ad campaigns to get a deal done. that is extremely hopeful. after all, tease are money men. the previous strategy of doing nothing cost them big. it's rational they put the big lobbying and ad dollars behind those and went to compromise rather than those who want to sink, blow, and stand on principle that could drive us into recession by early 2013. now that's a principle. to me, the clock is ticking. the democrats have to show the diehard republicans that a strategy of protecting the rights of rich people including hedge funds and private equity fund managers to pay lower taxes is a loser that could get them thrown out of office. the republicans have to show the democrats there mu
checked out the tesla? my take is tesla didn't go down because romney lost but i need earnings. i've got enough problems with the companies that have big earnings, big dividends, i don't need to go into the speculative mode right now. please be careful. with the fiscal cliff looming the early bird is not catching the worm right now. it's just getting crushed. okay? the fiscal clifford, yes -- fiscal clifford, the big red ink dog is going to crush the early birds. it's too late to sell for most stocks already, though. well, let's say for a lot of them. and it's right to start legging in on the ones that worked last time. recession-resistant and the already back to higher yield stocks. "mad money" will be right back. >> announcer: coming up, party planning. >> surprise! >> announcer: when quarterly reports take the street by surprise, investors can be the ones receiving gifts. tonight, cramer's celebrating two retailers that left the market awestruck after earnings. but the fun's not done yet. there could be more room for these stocks to rise. find out who they are and if they belong in yo
Search Results 0 to 20 of about 21 (some duplicates have been removed)